- #AMD RADEON HD 6350 VS INTEL HD GRAPHICS 2000 1080P#
- #AMD RADEON HD 6350 VS INTEL HD GRAPHICS 2000 DRIVER#
- #AMD RADEON HD 6350 VS INTEL HD GRAPHICS 2000 SERIES#
The Radeon HD 2400 series used a 64-bit-wide memory bus. It had 180 million transistors on a 65 nm fabrication process.
The Radeon HD 2400 series was based on the codenamed RV610 GPU. CrossFire efficiency was improved and shows performance approaching the theoretical maximum of twice the performance of a single card. Īll variants support CrossFireX technology. Audio is transmitted via DVI port, with specially designed DVI-to-HDMI dongle for HDMI output that carries both audio and video. HDMI was introduced, supporting display resolutions up to 1,920×1,080, with integrated HD audio controller with 5.1-channel LPCM and AC3 encoding support. Each DVI output includes dual-link HDCP encoder with on-chip decipher key. HDTV encoding support is implemented via the integrated AMD Xilleon encoder the companion Rage Theater chip used on the Radeon X1000 series was replaced with the digital Theater 200 chip, providing VIVO capabilities.įor display outputs, all variants include two dual-link TMDS transmitters, except for HD 2400 and HD 3400, which include one single and one dual-link TMDS transmitters. The HD 2900 GPU dies do not have a UVD core, as its stream processors were powerful enough to handle most of the steps of video acceleration in its stead except for entropy decoding and bitstream processing which are left for the CPU to perform. The Unified Video Decoder (UVD) SIP core is on- die in the HD 2400 and the HD 2600. They all contain a GPU which implements TeraScale 1, ATI's first Unified shader model microarchitecture for PCs. This article is about all products under the brand "Radeon HD 2000 Series".
#AMD RADEON HD 6350 VS INTEL HD GRAPHICS 2000 DRIVER#
5.2 Free and open-source graphics device driver "Radeon".5.1 AMD's proprietary graphics device driver "Catalyst".The HD Graphics 4600 can be found on dual- and quad-core Haswell models in the 37 - 57 Watt TDP range. Thus, the HD 4600 not only matches some dedicated GPUs such as the GeForce GT 620M/630M, but also competes with the fastest integrated AMD GPUs like the Radeon HD 8650G.ĭue to the 22nm 3D Tri-Gate production process, power consumption should be relatively low. This performance boost is achieved by architectural improvements and an increased number of execution units: The GT2 version integrates 20 EUs, compared to 16 EUs for the old HD 4000. In our gaming benchmarks, however, the improvement was only about 30 percent.
It also features an improved decoder for 4K videos and the fast Quick Sync encoder.Īccording to Intel benchmarks in 3DMark 11, the HD Graphics 4600 will be up to 60 percent faster than the previous HD 4000. The GPU supports DirectX 11.1, OpenCL 1.2 and OpenGL 4.0.
In comparison to the HD 4000, the graphics core has been modified extensively. The base clock can be automatically overclocked using Turbo Boost technology.ĭepending on the processor model, the base and turbo clock rates may differ greatly resulting in varying graphics performance between CPU models. The Intel HD Graphics 4600 (GT2) is a processor graphics card included in some of the Haswell processors of 2013. Intel HD Graphics 4600 ► remove from comparison Another novelty of the Sandy Bridge GPU is the embedded DisplayPort eDP to connect internal Displays.ĭue to the integration in the 32nm built CPU and the halfed amount of shaders, the power consumption of the GPU should be quite low and also suited for small and light laptops.
#AMD RADEON HD 6350 VS INTEL HD GRAPHICS 2000 1080P#
On the IDF Intel demonstrated the encoding of a 3 minute long 1080p video to an iPhone compatible format in 640x360 in only 14s. In addition to the GPU, the chip also houses some dedicated units for decoding and encoding HD videos. In the Unigine Valley benchmark a similar HD 3000 i7-2637M for example reached the same score with 2x AA and 4x AA. Therefore, only low demanding games like Sims 3 or World of Warcraft can be played in low detail settings fluently.Īltought 2x Antialiasing (AA) is supported, the chip is as fast as when rendering 4x AA. Our tests with a desktop i5-2400 showed a performance level of a Geforce G 105M e.g. Because of the halfed amount of shaders, the gaming performance is only compareable to the old Intel GMA HD (in the Arrandale CPUs).
0 kommentar(er)
